Friday, December 01, 2006

Conflict of wills--The great collide

I ever came across this interesting idea about how humans have a channel of interaction with their environment in ways that are intangible and intrinsically dependent on their moods which in turn have an effect on the response they receive from their surroundings. This form of interaction can be translated into fourier wave response curves and according to the findings that purported this revoluntionary idea, patterns can be identified. It was also found that these patterns are unique to the physical appearance of the surrounding specimen. As to what information was collected to derive these response curves, I cant really recall. One really incredible but convincingly defended example was how scientists were sometimes inconsistent with their experimental results which were later found to be related to their initial notion and expected outcomes. Its like if you believe in a certain outcome, your mind and body will work in ways that you may not be aware of to achieve that desired results. Some may link it to psychokinetics, the power of will, etc, etc. Seriously, despite the leap mankind has taken since the beginning of science and technology, there is still a multitude of unanswered and unaccountable phenomenas and questions. In fact, the more we explore, the more we realise how great our hole of ignorance is and its getting bigger and bigger with new discoveries and scientific breakthroughs. Its an endless race to fill up the gap. And it makes sense cos if everything can be explained and proven, where will religion stand?

And so what happens when a group of people working together have different expectations and varying strengths of will? A hell load of chaos. But then again, chaos theory, though it may sound melodramatic, demonstrates self-correcting mechanisms to bring a system of equilibria. You may envision a certain end result whereas someone else may will against your intentions and expect a totally opposite outcome. In the end, who wins? What will be the outcome? Whatever it is, I hope chaos theory will still apply. After all, isnt it apparent in globalisation? So much chaos but in fact there is a certain degree of order and uniformity surfacing. So who is willing for this state of equillibria to occur? Hmm...the prominence of religions and its importance of exitence is still very much dominant, at least, for now.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Part 1: Try Pygmalion Effect.

Part 2: Try Game Theory.

1:12 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.

5:31 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home